My heart is still raining
So far,
800 words has been wrote for my assignment.
Still left 700 words to go on tonight.
When I was doing my assignment,
keep thinking Lim Kim Neo told me
'I didnt bluffed you at all including the add math incident'.
Should I now begin to brainwash myself it wasn't real? It's merely a dream?
It wasn't a real hurt, it's a fake wound,
it's time to start trusting the beneficial lie,
this is the only way to stop my bleeding heart.
Raining princess,
please stop the big rain in your heart; stop rolling tears from your eyes,
stop wondering what's the answer, stop asking yourself what had happened,
stop grumbling your memory fault, stop doubting what has happened,
stop pouring the 'extra salts' on your old wound by assuming your dream as real.
Also true,
you ask people that way, will people hao yi shi to answer you the truth?
Raining princess,
can you give people some face to avoid this explanation and respect others privacy?
Can you?
In fact,
she doesn't demand in your life but water.
It has been raining and thunder for so long,
what you need to do now is to step by step turn the big rain into drizzle.
At least,
'drizzling' is still acceptable.
When can you stop the rain in your heart?
Once your heart stop drizzling,
the dark shadow will disappeared and a rainbow will be seen.
For my deep sense towards add math incident,
the feeling is like felt like had happened and at the same time felt like it didn't happen.
I don't really know why I have this feeling from the day happened until now,
once I woke up from bed,
I saw the wounds on my leg,
having the partial memory about it,
could vividly recalled it happened on the bench,
could remembered both of them holding the cane,
but only have the ,ild impression towards the unwanted flashbacks which she caning my leg harshly and repetitively; had a vague memory she used hand hit my front face too.
This part of mild impression has been tortured me for years,
felt like did happened, at the same time felt like did not happened.
To stop this doubt in the deepest core of my heart,
once again,
I typed on the Google search engine,
'Why memory is controversy?'
and
'how to remember it.'
It came out
Why Memories Sometimes Play Tricks on Us
Copyright 2009, Pamela Woll
Of the many things about trauma they never taught us about in school, some of the most confusing have to do with the way memory behaves—and misbehaves—during and after trauma.
Most people have very incomplete information about the role of memory in trauma and its aftermath:
|
But the thing is I don't want this theorical answer or biological explanation,
I want a solid, truthful clear explanation about why I couldn't remember add math incident?
Perhaps,
just like what Jerry said,
he said I am assuming Google as 'Wan Neng' (universal).
LOL! Everything just typed from Google.
Even when asking a salary of lecturer also typed Google.
He even laughed at me when I typed in the google search engine
'What is the salary of lecturer in Australia'
This time,
I even more exaggerating,
I typed in the Google search engine
'Why the memory of add math incident is controvercy'
it came out nothing.
Subsequently,
I typed in a more 'normal' question,
I typed
'why a traumatic memory is controversial.'
Finally,
it came out with this question.
There are differing schools of thought, grounded in solid research and clinical experience, about the reliability of memory. The details of this scientific debate are often obscure, and the subtleties can be confusing to the public.
Some researchers have proven in the laboratory that ordinary or slightly stressful memories are easily distorted. These scientists are concerned that therapists may be unintentionally distorting the memories of people who report histories of traumatic abuse. This is of particular concern to scientists studying the effects of hypnosis on eyewitness testimony because there is laboratory evidence that setting and expectation can "contaminate" a person's memories.
However, this laboratory research on ordinary memory may be irrelevant in regard to memories of traumatic experiences. Scientists argue that traumatic memories are different from ordinary clinical memories in the way they are encoded on the brain. There is evidence that trauma is stored in the part of the brain called the limbic system, which processes emotions and sensations, but not language or speech. For this reason, people who have been traumatized may live with implicit memories of the terror, anger, and sadness generated by the trauma, but with few or no explicit memories to explain the feelings. Trauma clinicians believe that implicit memories are not easily distorted. It would, of course be unethical to create in a laboratory setting the traumatic experiences necessary to study traumatic memories and their ease of contamination or distortion. For this reason, our knowledge of traumatic memories must come from clinical experience. Clinical data since 1919 has shown a direct correlation between trauma and amnesia or other memory disturbance (Van der Kolk, 1994).
Sometimes a current event or experience may trigger long-forgotten memories of earlier trauma. Often when this happens, the person may be "flooded" with implicit sensorimotor memory: he or she may have just the picture, the feeling, the physiological panic aroused by the memory of the traumatic event without the facts that would explain the meaning of the sensations. Initially, the person may not even be aware of what has triggered the memory, or how the pictures and feelings relate to his or her life.
There is often intense psychological distress when a person is exposed to events which in some way resemble or symbolize the past trauma. These "triggers" may be any sound, smell, or other stimulus such as hot, humid weather which may remind a veteran of his service in southeast Asia, or the smell of a particular cologne which was worn by an abuser.
At this time, there is no completely accurate way of determining the validity of abuse reports without external corroboration, and that kind of corroboration is often impossible. Many things—questioning (especially of young children), suggestion by a trusted person, even the recounting of a traumatic experience in therapy—may influence the accuracy of abuse memories. Even people who have documented corroboration about their abuse may have inconsistent elements in their stories.
Nevertheless, trauma specialists such as Harvard's Dr. Bessel van der Kolk believe that "the body cannot lie." If a person spontaneously sees a flashback and feels terrified, the feeling can be trusted, especially before an implicit memory has been discussed and possibly contaminated. If the person has the symptoms of PTSD, or a dissociative disorder that is known to be associated with a traumatic history, then it is likely that there are real traumatic experiences in the person's background. Unless one is preparing for a criminal investigation, the exact authenticity of a specific memory may not be important.
It is the job of the individual to figure out his or her own life history. Many people with post-traumatic stress or dissociative disorders have found it helpful to gather information from siblings or other family members to help them understand their memories.
Yes,
I am doubting the third question right now,
'Can I believe my memories?'
From what I pondered is the content of second question,
'he or she may have just the picture, the feeling, the physiological panic aroused by the memory of the traumatic event without the facts that would explain the meaning of the sensations.'
Means what lcl said was right?
From what I dream wasn't real?
May just have picture, feeling and panic of the event without the facts?
I am thinking again and again should I trust her now?
and this statement
'Even people who have documented corroboration about their abuse may have inconsistent elements in their stories. '
It means I always said things inconsistently?
Alwhile said she caned me 7 times, awhile said she caned me 40-50 times?
Awhile think she slapped me, awhile said she did not.
Awhile think she caned me on the table, awhile said she caned me on bench.
Awhile think she used good cane to caned me, awhile said she used spoiled cane to caned me?
and it wrote
' Many people with post-traumatic stress or dissociative disorders have found it helpful to gather information from siblings or other family members to help them understand their memories. '
I gonna gather my memory from who?
My siblings and family members don't witness it,
nobody saw it but only pl and lcl.
But the problem is lcl keep bluffing me.
Awhile said this awhile said that :(
Awhile said she caned me twice and her mum once,
awhile said she caned me once and her mum twice.
She told me said I want to run out to the road so her mum caned me,
but she told Hung Kiat that I kicked her mum so her mum caned me.
When I asked her
'Why I suddenly ran out to the road?'
She said
'Because you bluffed us said your driver came d.'
Hmmmm....
from the analysis of my personality,
it sounds authentic....
But at the same time,
I am thinking
'Hmm! This lcl, sure she know I will like that ones and know if she said like that I will believed... so simply said like this and bluffed me... cannot cannot... cannot believed her.'
And also,
I even think of
'This lcl, saw I count the add math wounds in the video then quickly blocked me, or she scared already mean it really got 40-50 times?'
Avoiding represents afraid,
and afraid means really got happened before so only she would afraid?
Why she so scared when seeing the video?
she is avoiding the evidence from me means it really got happened?
Ain't that avoiding is a sort of acquiescence?
Gosh!
Don't care dyyyy....
I must found this memory only I can don't go pl's house!
This is my promise to myself;
to treat myself in the future.







0 comments